Perspectives of Industrial Pedagogy in Workplaces as Spaces of Education and Transformation

Prospettive di pedagogia industriale nei luoghi di lavoro come spazi di formazione e trasformazione

by Cinzia Turli

San Raffaele Roma Online University, UniRoma 5 Corporate Humanist, Lazzaroni SpA
Digital transformation, automation, and artificial intelligence are profoundly redefining contemporary work. In this scenario, industrial pedagogy emerges as a theoretical and operational paradigm capable of reinterpreting workplaces not merely as productive spaces, but as educational environments oriented toward the development of human capital and organizational sustainability.

The Centrality of the Person and Human Capital

Industrial pedagogy places the worker-person at the center, overcoming an exclusively economic vision of the enterprise. Public and private organizations become environments of continuous learning, in which work is configured as a formative and transformative experience. Within this perspective, human capital represents the main strategic lever for:
  • cognitive and metacognitive development;
  • emotional and relational growth;
  • construction of professional identity;
  • strengthening the sense of organizational belonging.
The enterprise thus becomes an intentional space of educability, capable of integrating productivity and personal growth.

Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Work

Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics are changing the structure of competencies required within productive systems. Repetitive activities increasingly tend to be automated, while high-complexity competencies acquire growing value.
  • social intelligence and empathy;
  • creativity and critical thinking;
  • complex problem solving;
  • decision-making capacity under conditions of uncertainty.
Industrial pedagogy proposes a model of human-AI integration based on complementarity and educational governance of technologies, avoiding substitutional logics while promoting a strategic and responsible use of digital innovation.

Reflective Thinking and Organizational Learning

One of the central pillars of the model is the recovery of reflective thinking as a key competence for the future of work. Organizations must train professionals capable of:
  • tolerating ambiguity and complexity;
  • critically reviewing beliefs and procedures;
  • learning continuously and autonomously;
  • managing uncertainty within dynamic environments.
The introduction of dialogical practices, professional communities, and inquiry methodologies makes it possible to transform workplaces into permanent laboratories of learning.

Self-Generative Training and Communities

The traditional paradigm of external and occasional training proves insufficient in relation to the speed of technological transformations. A model of self-generative training, developed internally within organizations, becomes necessary. This approach makes it possible to:
  • identify critical issues directly within work processes;
  • encourage interdisciplinary contamination;
  • stimulate shared responsibility;
  • modernize public and private structures.
Professional communities become spaces for the collective construction of knowledge and the consolidation of organizational culture.

Skills for the Future of Work

The two major transformative waves — automation and artificial intelligence — require a revision of educational curricula. Strategic competencies include:
  • learning to learn;
  • metacognitive competence;
  • cognitive flexibility;
  • emotional resilience;
  • capacity for continuous adaptation.
Professionalism no longer coincides with the mere accumulation of knowledge, but with the ability to integrate knowledge, experience, and critical reflexivity. Within the Italian context, the digital transition supported by the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR) and public administration innovation policies makes continuous education and reskilling central priorities. Industrial pedagogy offers a coherent framework for supporting the modernization of both public and private systems. At the European level, strategies concerning Digital Skills, Industry 5.0, and Human-Centric AI converge toward a model in which the person remains at the center of technological processes. In this scenario, the pedagogization of workplaces emerges as a lever capable of combining economic competitiveness and social sustainability.

Conclusions

Industrial pedagogy represents an integrated model capable of governing contemporary complexity. Transforming workplaces into educational spaces means investing in human capital, promoting responsible innovation, and preparing for the integration between human beings and artificial intelligence. In an era of accelerated transformations, organizational education becomes the strategic foundation for building productive systems that are inclusive, resilient, and future-oriented.

Bibliographical References

  • ACONE, G. (2005). The Theoretical Horizon of Contemporary Pedagogy. Foundations and Perspectives. Edisud, Salerno.
  • ALESSANDRINI, G. (Ed.) (2016). Smart Working. New Skills and Competencies. Pensa Multimedia, Lecce-Rovato.
  • ASSAGIOLI, R. (1973). Principles and Methods of Therapeutic Psychosynthesis. Astrolabio, Rome.
  • CORSI, M. (1993). Managing Change. Vita e Pensiero, Milan.
  • COSENTINO, A. (2011). Philosophy as Social Practice. Liguori, Naples.
  • CUNTI, A. (2008). Help Me Choose. Guidance Pathways to Design and Self-Design. FrancoAngeli, Milan.
  • DEMETRIO, D., FABBRI, D., & GHERARDI, S. (2002). Learning in Organizations. Proposals for Cognitive Growth in Adulthood. Carocci, Rome.
  • MARGIOTTA, U. (2012). From Welfare to Learnfare: Toward a New Social Contract. In M. Baldacci, F. Frabboni, & U. Margiotta, Longlife/Longwide Learning. Toward a European Treaty on Education (pp. 125–157). Mondadori, Milan.
  • MILLER, W. R., & C’DE BACA, J. (2001). Quantum Change. When Epiphanies and Sudden Insights Transform Ordinary Lives. Guilford Press, New York.
  • MORTARI, L. (2003). Learning from Experience. Reflective Thinking in Education. Carocci, Rome.
  • PANCIROLI, C., & RIVOLTELLA, P. C. (2023). Algorithmic Pedagogy. For an Educational Reflection on Artificial Intelligence. Scholé, Brescia.
  • SANTI, M. (2002). Philosophizing with Children. Conversation with M. Lipman. In A. Cosentino (Ed.), Philosophy and Education. Ten Years of Philosophy for Children in Italy (pp. 47–60). Liguori, Naples.
  • STROLLO, M. R. (2016). The Development of Competencies for Active Citizenship: From Theory to Practice. Civitas Educationis: Education, Politics, and Culture, 5(1), 235–254.
  • TURLI, C. (2021). Between Person and Market. New Perspectives of Industrial Pedagogy. Rubettino, Soveria Mannelli.